4IR
Since declaring independence from the Brits in 1776, the United States has experienced three different industrial revolutions, and now is in the midst of its fourth. With technologies such as the steam engine, the first revolution changed the agrarian society into an industrial one. The second built off this momentum using steel, oil, and electricity to power mass production and mobilize individuals at the household level. The third coincided with the dot-com era as everything shifted from analog technology to digital – bringing a whole new way of achieving globalism. That brings us to 4IR – the time of robotics, artificial intelligence, nanotechnology, quantum computing, biotechnology, the Internet of Things, 3D printing, and autonomous vehicles. 4IR consists of even more connectivity among individuals and countries, bringing unimaginable efficiencies. See “Estonia – The Future…?” for one example of how a government can completely transform itself using blockchain technology – a technology that digitally connected all governmental departments and saved them 800+ hours of labor last year alone. 4IR has just begun and will continue transforming the way business and government is conducted, with one common thread positioned for all to gain and lose – the people of this innovation. Steps need to be taken to prepare the work force’s next generation, and it’s going to require significant upskilling, as well as a new look at the type of jobs that will be offered in the future.
With these changes come many threats and opportunities to human rights as we know them today. The World Economic Forum does a nice job of capturing this next generation and boiling them down to five specific areas that will be at the forefront of human rights in the future – 1. Data and privacy, Policing and criminal justice, 3. Work and worker’s rights, 4. Inequality, 5. Unrest and conflict. These points coincide with our Viewpoints on this blog’s landing page. Fortunately, the World Economic Forum also provided a positive spin to these technological advances that showcase the opportunities for human rights, keeping values-based leadership top-of-mind. As mentioned in Phoebe’s post, “Governing Our Panoptic State,” it is essential to keep the common good at the core of technological advances. With the nature of rapid development often building off itself, any inherent biases will be difficult to retroactively change. We remain optimistic about the ability of this technology to provide the just, safe, and efficient society that can provide the essential resources for each individual to reach their potential.